BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Topic 10 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 10
[All OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

What is correct about the modeling of individual things with UML?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In UML, modeling individual things (such as instances) involves making statements about them. Here are the details for each option:

A . A UML Model can contain individual things (e.g. Instances) UML does not prescribe the level of detail to be used in the description.

This statement is partially correct. UML models can indeed contain individual things (instances), but the level of detail is not explicitly prescribed by UML. However, the statement does not cover the possibility of incomplete or imprecise information.

B . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things If a thing is an instance of a Classifier, these statements must be consistent (all mandatory Properties must be defined, all Constraints must be satisfied).

While it is true that a UML model can contain statements about individual things (instances), the requirement for consistency (mandatory properties and constraints) is not explicitly mentioned in UML. Therefore, this option is not entirely accurate.

C . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, and abstract, but not wrong.

This statement is also partially correct. UML allows for incomplete, imprecise, and abstract statements about individual things. However, it does not guarantee that these statements cannot be wrong.

D . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual.

This option provides a more accurate representation. UML allows for statements about individual things that can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, and even potentially incorrect. It acknowledges the uncertainty and variability in modeling individual things.

E . A UML Model can only contain statements about sets of individual things (e.g. Classifiers).

This statement is incorrect. UML models can contain statements about both individual things (instances) and sets of things (classifiers).


UML 2.5.1 Specification

While the UML specification does not explicitly state the options, it provides the foundation for UML modeling principles and allows for flexibility in expressing statements about individual things.

Remember that UML is a modeling language, and its primary purpose is to capture and communicate information about systems and their components. The level of detail, precision, and correctness can vary based on the modeling context and the specific use case. Therefore, option D best reflects the UML approach to modeling individual things.

Please note that the information provided here is based on UML 2.5.1, and it's essential to consult the official UML specification for the most accurate and up-to-date details.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Callie
3 months ago
I agree with Belen, I also think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
4 months ago
Option D sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card. 'Incomplete, imprecise, and even wrong? Sign me up!'
upvoted 0 times
Ronald
2 months ago
I agree, accuracy is important when it comes to modeling individual things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
3 months ago
I think we should aim for more precision in our modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
3 months ago
Yeah, it does seem like you can get away with a lot with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
3 months ago
Option D does sound like a get-out-of-jail-free card.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margot
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
4 months ago
B all the way. Consistency and rigor are important, even if reality doesn't always oblige. UML isn't for the faint of heart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
4 months ago
Haha, option E is a joke. Of course UML can model individual things, not just classifiers. This exam is a breeze!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
I'd go with D. UML models can contain statements about individuals that may even be counterfactual. Flexibility is key, right?
upvoted 0 times
Novella
3 months ago
Absolutely, being able to capture a wide range of possibilities is crucial in modeling individual things with UML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
3 months ago
That's true, flexibility is definitely important when modeling with UML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
4 months ago
D) A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shanice
4 months ago
Option B seems the most comprehensive and accurate to me. UML models should have consistent and well-defined statements about instances.
upvoted 0 times
Natalya
3 months ago
I think option D also makes sense. UML models can have statements that may turn out to be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
4 months ago
I agree, option B is the most accurate. Consistency is key in UML modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivienne
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel