Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCSE-Core Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCSE-Core exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 1
[All NCSE-Core Questions]

A prospect is conducting a Nutanix POC process that will measure the time to revocer from a power loss, the impact of running multiple workloads on the same cluster, and peak storage performance. The POC results will be presented to the CIO.

How can this be achieved with the least room for error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gerald
5 months ago
Option D, baby! Nothing beats the raw power of HCI Bench and the Prism Analysis data. Plus, manually powering off the nodes is just a fun little party trick, am I right? The CIO will be so impressed, they'll be begging to buy Nutanix.
upvoted 0 times
Milly
5 months ago
Totally agree! The Prism Analysis data is key for presenting to the CIO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
5 months ago
Option D all the way! HCI Bench is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristal
6 months ago
You know, I'm a bit of a purist, so I'd say Option B is the way to go. The X-Ray scenarios are tried and true, and the report is just so darn clean and professional. Plus, it's probably the easiest way to convince the CIO to buy into Nutanix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
6 months ago
Hah, I remember the good old days when we had to manually power off nodes and use iOmeter. Those were the days, am I right? But seriously, Option D is the way to go - gotta love that Prism Analysis data.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
5 months ago
Using HCI Bench and exporting Prism Analysis data is the most reliable method for this POC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
6 months ago
I agree, manually powering off nodes during testing and exporting the data is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
6 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Prism Analysis data is so valuable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
6 months ago
But option D involves manual intervention, which could introduce errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
6 months ago
I dunno, Option D seems like the most comprehensive approach to me. HCI Bench is great for getting a holistic view of the system's performance, and the Prism Analysis data is hard to beat.
upvoted 0 times
Elina
5 months ago
Definitely, having that holistic view of the system's performance is key for presenting results to the CIO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
5 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most comprehensive approach for the POC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go. HCI Bench and Prism Analysis data are solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
6 months ago
As someone who's done their fair share of Nutanix POCs, I'd say Option B is the way to go. The X-Ray scenarios are designed to cover all the key metrics, and the report makes it super easy to present the findings to the CIO.
upvoted 0 times
Galen
5 months ago
Definitely, the X-Ray PDF report will make it easy to present the results to the CIO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
I agree, Option B with X-Ray scenarios is the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
Definitely, the X-Ray PDF report will make it easy to present the results to the CIO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
6 months ago
I agree, Option B with X-Ray scenarios is the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantell
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel