An administrator has configured AHV Metro Availability with Witness and is testing failover scenarios.
During testing, the administrator disconnects the primary and recovery clusters but Prism Central remains connected to the recovery site.
What are two expected system behaviors? (Choose two.)
When connectivity between Metro clusters is lost, Nutanix Metro Availability ensures data integrity using Witness for automatic failover.
Option A (Guest VM I/O operations pause until connectivity is restored) is correct:
Metro Availability enforces data consistency, so I/O operations pause until failover is confirmed.
Option C (Guest VMs failover automatically to the recovery cluster) is correct:
The Witness VM detects the failure and initiates an automatic failover to the secondary cluster.
Option B is incorrect:
Prism Central does not control VM failover in Metro Availability.
Option D is incorrect:
The primary cluster is unreachable, so VMs cannot continue running there.
Nutanix Metro Availability Guide How Witness Handles Failover Scenarios
Nutanix KB I/O Freezing and Failover Behavior in Metro Clusters
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!