Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCM-MCI-5.15 Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCM-MCI-5.15 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All NCM-MCI-5.15 Questions]

A customer has a Nutanix cluster with 10Gb connectivity via switch fabric extenders. The administrator receives NCC health check errors of latency greater than 200ms.

Which action should the administrator take to resolve the NCC errors?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by James at Apr 10, 2024, 06:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCM-MCI-5.15 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sue
9 months ago
Yeah, I believe bond state and network latency play a bigger role in addressing these issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
9 months ago
I don't think the number of NICs connected has a significant impact on cluster performance compared to bond state and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
9 months ago
But what about the number of NICs connected? Could that also be a factor?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
10 months ago
I agree with Asha, those parameters are key to correcting high IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
10 months ago
I think we should focus on bond state and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
Hmm, that might also impact performance. Good point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
10 months ago
I would go with C) Number of NICs connected and frame size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
10 months ago
But bond state is important for load balancing and fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B) Number of NICs connected and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Bond State and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
12 months ago
Yeah, Option B sounds like the most logical choice. Increasing the number of NICs can help with load balancing and redundancy, which could help address the high IOPs and latency issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Increasing the number of NICs can help distribute the network traffic and potentially improve performance. And network latency is definitely a factor to consider here.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
11 months ago
Exactly, optimizing both parameters can help resolve the issue with high cluster IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
11 months ago
So, it's a combination of increasing NICs and managing network latency for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
11 months ago
Yes, network latency can contribute to high cluster IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
11 months ago
Don't forget about network latency, that's an important factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
11 months ago
Agreed, having more NICs connected can definitely improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
11 months ago
Option B seems like a good choice. More NICs can help with traffic distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
12 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. Option A mentions bond state and network latency, which could be relevant. Option B talks about the number of NICs and network latency, which also seems like a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
12 months ago
I agree. Based on the options, it seems like we need to look at the parameters that can impact network performance and potentially address the high IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
12 months ago
You're right, that's a good observation. Networking is the suspected issue, so the answer should be related to network configuration parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
12 months ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. It's definitely testing our understanding of Nutanix cluster networking parameters. I think the key here is to focus on the specific problem mentioned - high cluster IOPs and Cluster Controller Latency.
upvoted 0 times
Margarita
10 months ago
I think so. It seems to address both issues of high cluster IOPs and Cluster Controller Latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
10 months ago
So, would option B) Number of NICs connected and network latency be the correct choice then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 months ago
Yes, I agree. But we also need to consider the network latency as mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
11 months ago
I think the networking parameters we need to configure are related to the number of NICs connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel