Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-M05 Topic 4 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-M05 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 4
[All 4A0-M05 Questions]

Which of the following statements regarding CMM log management is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Katlyn at May 30, 2024, 11:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-M05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Raul
10 months ago
Wait, so are we testing our networking knowledge or our dad joke skills? Because I've got a good one about a router that fell off a shelf. It's a bit edgy, but it's connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
10 months ago
A is the trick question here. Bonding is for the hypervisor, not the guest VMs. The redundancy is provided by the VFs, not the bonding.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
9 months ago
B) Guest VMs have two virtual NICs connected to VFs on different physical SR-IOV ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
A) SR-IOV provides redundancy through a Linux bonded interface on the hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
10 months ago
D is definitely false. The interface bonding can be set to active/active mode for redundancy as well, not just active/standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
10 months ago
Because Ethernet frames are not sent between the two interfaces for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Sending Ethernet frames to verify connectivity seems a bit overkill for a simple redundancy setup.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
10 months ago
I'm not convinced. I think it might be unnecessary to send frames just for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
10 months ago
I agree with Gene. It helps ensure that both interfaces are working properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
10 months ago
I think C is actually true. It's a common practice to send frames between interfaces for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
10 months ago
I think the false statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
10 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. Having two virtual NICs connected to different physical SR-IOV ports provides redundancy for the guest VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Diane
10 months ago
B) Guest VMs have two virtual NICs connected to VFs on different physical SR-IOV ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
10 months ago
A) SR-IOV provides redundancy through a Linux bonded interface on the hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
10 months ago
B) Guest VMs have two virtual NICs connected to VFs on different physical SR-IOV ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
10 months ago
A) SR-IOV provides redundancy through a Linux bonded interface on the hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
10 months ago
B) Guest VMs have two virtual NICs connected to VFs on different physical SR-IOV ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
10 months ago
A) SR-IOV provides redundancy through a Linux bonded interface on the hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel