Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-255 Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-255 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-255 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit that shows a demand matrix, a network topology with candidate links (in thick blue lines and dashed lines), the defined network in thick blue lines and the demand routing (colored numbers in the figure). Every link is 80 km long. Which of the following requirements is supported by this network design with the displayed demand routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Hannah at Nov 19, 2024, 01:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-255 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Melissia
1 months ago
Wait, wasn't this network designed by the same team that planned the London Underground? Talk about 'minimum latency'...
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
1 months ago
Hah, I bet the network designer was a former Formula 1 engineer - this routing is all about speed, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
9 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it looks like they prioritized minimizing latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
12 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it looks like they prioritized speed in the routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
13 days ago
User 1: I think the network design is focused on minimum latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
14 days ago
User 1: I think the network design is focused on speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michal
1 months ago
I disagree, I think it's D. The network can handle two link faults without disrupting the service, which is crucial for resilience.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryll
4 days ago
Hmm, I see your point. It could be D) Resilience against two link faults as well. The network does seem to have redundancy to handle multiple failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
10 days ago
I still believe it's D) Resilience against two link faults. The network design appears to have backup paths for each demand to handle multiple link failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
18 days ago
I agree with you, it looks like B) Minimum cost design. The routing seems to be optimized for cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
27 days ago
I think it's A) 1+1 protection. The network seems to have redundant paths for each demand, ensuring protection against a single link failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
Definitely C. Look at those demand routings - they're designed to minimize latency, not maximize protection or cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
21 days ago
I think the demand routing indicates a preference for minimizing latency as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
23 days ago
Yes, it seems like the network design prioritizes low latency over other factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
24 days ago
I agree, the demand routing clearly shows a focus on minimizing latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaclyn
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be for 1+1 protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I agree with Jesusa. The demand routing seems to have redundancy for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I think the network design supports resilience against two link faults.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel