New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-205 Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-205 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All 4A0-205 Questions]

What is a Shared Risk Group (SRG)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the Nokia Optical Networking documentation, a Shared Risk Group (SRG) is defined as 'a set of network resources that share a common failure risk. When a resource in an SRG fails, the other resources in the group are also affected.' This can include fibers, boards, nodes, and other network resources. The SRG concept is used in network design and protection mechanisms to ensure survivability and minimal impact on service in case of a failure.


by Fabiola at Jul 03, 2024, 07:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-205 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marci
4 months ago
Is there a 'None of the above' option? I mean, who even came up with these choices? They're all a bit... 'meh'.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) A set of network resources that share a common failure risk makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
4 months ago
I think it's C) A set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
4 months ago
I agree, these options are not very clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
4 months ago
Option D all the way! A set of network resources that share a common failure risk. Redundancy is key, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
5 months ago
I'm going with A. A set of fibers that share the same latency risk. Gotta love those low-latency network connections!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. A set of boards that share the same failure risk or a set of network resources that share a common failure risk. I'll go with D, it sounds more inclusive.
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
3 months ago
Olene: Hmm, I see your point. But I still think it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
3 months ago
I agree with Hyman. A sounds more accurate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
4 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I'm leaning towards A. A set of fibers that share the same latency risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
4 months ago
I think it's C. A set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odelia
5 months ago
I think it's more likely to be a set of boards that share the same failure risk, but I see how network resources could also be part of it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. A set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure. That's what I'm going with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
5 months ago
I think it's option D. A set of network resources that share a common failure risk. That seems like the most comprehensive description.
upvoted 0 times
Nathan
4 months ago
Yes, it definitely sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
4 months ago
I agree, option D makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
5 months ago
I believe it could also be a set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
6 months ago
I agree with James, it makes sense that SRG would involve network resources sharing a common failure risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
6 months ago
I think a Shared Risk Group is a set of network resources that share a common failure risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel