Nokia Exam 4A0-116 Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-116 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 5

[All 4A0-116 Questions]

Which of the following statements about SR-TE administrative constraints is FALSE?

AA strict hop must be adjacent to the previous hop in the list.

BThe TE metric for a link is by default the same as the IGP metric.

CShared-Risk-Link Groups are only taken into account when calculating the secondary path.

DThe head-end router may calculate a path that takes into account max hop count and bandwidth constraints.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Shared-Risk-Link Groups(SRLG) is taken into account when calculating both primary and secondary path to avoid routing over the same physical link.

by Dorothy at Sep 15, 2024, 09:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-116 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Claribel

6 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writer is trying to trick us with these options. SR-TE is all about adding constraints, not removing them!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

6 months ago

Option D sounds about right. The head-end router should be able to consider hop count and bandwidth when calculating the path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

6 months ago

Option A seems a bit tricky. Is a strict hop really required to be adjacent to the previous one? Doesn't SR-TE allow for more flexibility?

upvoted 0 times

Alexia

5 months ago

D) The head-end router may calculate a path that takes into account max hop count and bandwidth constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

5 months ago

C) Shared-Risk-Link Groups are only taken into account when calculating the secondary path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

5 months ago

B) The TE metric for a link is by default the same as the IGP metric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

5 months ago

A) A strict hop must be adjacent to the previous hop in the list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jody

6 months ago

Hmm, I thought Option B was true. Isn't the TE metric usually different from the IGP metric to allow for better traffic engineering?

upvoted 0 times

Amina

5 months ago

User 3: That's correct. The TE metric being the same as the IGP metric can limit the flexibility in traffic engineering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

5 months ago

User 2: Oh, I see. So that means better traffic engineering is not always guaranteed with SR-TE.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

5 months ago

User 1: Option B is actually false. The TE metric is by default the same as the IGP metric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

5 months ago

Man: That's correct. The TE metric needs to be configured separately for better traffic engineering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

5 months ago

Oh, I see. So that means better traffic engineering is not automatically allowed by default.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

6 months ago

Option B is actually false. The TE metric for a link is by default the same as the IGP metric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annita

6 months ago

I agree with Valentin, D is the false statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

6 months ago

I believe it's D because the head-end router can't consider max hop count.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

6 months ago

I think the false statement is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pauline

7 months ago

Option C is definitely false. Shared-Risk-Link Groups are taken into account for both the primary and secondary paths.

upvoted 0 times

Sharika

6 months ago

So, the head-end router can calculate a path based on hop count and bandwidth constraints?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

6 months ago

I agree, the statement about Shared-Risk-Link Groups is incorrect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

6 months ago

I think option C is false. Shared-Risk-Link Groups are considered for both paths.

upvoted 0 times

...