Nokia Exam 4A0-103 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 4

Click on the exhibit.

An LDP-over-RSVP tunnel is established between PE-1 and PE-2. Which of the following is NOT required to protect the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel?

APE-1 requires T-LDP sessions to both ABR-1 and ABR-2.

BPE-1 requires a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs to all routers in area 1.

CABR-1 requires T-LDP sessions to all ABRs in area 0.

DPE-1 requires fast reroute enabled on all RSVP-TE LSPs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Barrett at Apr 10, 2024, 09:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Walton

7 months ago

That's a good point. Fast reroute can provide additional protection, but having a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs is the primary requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

7 months ago

But what about option D) PE-1 requires fast reroute enabled on all RSVP-TE LSPs? Isn't that also important for protection?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

8 months ago

I agree, having a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs ensures that the tunnel is protected and traffic can be rerouted efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walton

8 months ago

I think the answer is B) PE-1 requires a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs to all routers in area 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

8 months ago

I think option C is not necessary because T-LDP sessions to all ABRs in area 0 may not directly relate to protecting the tunnel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

8 months ago

I believe fast reroute is essential for protecting the RSVP-TE LSPs, so option D is required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

9 months ago

I agree, option B doesn't seem relevant. But what about option D? Do we need fast reroute for protection?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

9 months ago

I think option B is not required because it doesn't relate to protecting the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivette

9 months ago

Agreed. That seems like overkill. I'm leaning more towards option C or D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

10 months ago

What about option B? A full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs to all routers in area 1? That sounds like a lot of work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vesta

10 months ago

You make a good point. I was thinking the same thing. Maybe we can rule that one out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

10 months ago

Okay, let's start with option A. Do we really need T-LDP sessions to both ABR-1 and ABR-2? That seems a bit excessive, doesn't it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jospeh

10 months ago

Yeah, I agree. There's a lot of information to unpack here. Let's go through the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

Jonell

8 months ago

I believe Option D is needed to ensure failover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

8 months ago

Option C is crucial for the connectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

8 months ago

I think Option B might be necessary as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

8 months ago

Option A seems important for the setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

10 months ago

Hey, guys, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I've got the right approach to protecting an LDP-over-RSVP tunnel.

upvoted 0 times

...