New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-102 Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-102 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 4
[All 4A0-102 Questions]

How is the aggregator attribute handled with 32-bit AS numbers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Johnna at Sep 18, 2024, 09:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Aide
2 months ago
Haha, option D sounds like the router's way of saying 'Hey, I know this is a 32-bit number, just bear with me here!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
1 months ago
That makes sense. So, we just have to wait for support to be added for 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
Yes, you're correct. Aggregation is not yet supported with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
2 months ago
C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards D. Using a dummy value to indicate the 32-bit AS number in the next TLV seems like a clever workaround.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, D seems like the most practical solution for handling the aggregator attribute with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
2 months ago
Agreed, using a dummy value to point to the actual 32-bit AS number makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
2 months ago
I think D is the correct option. It's a smart way to handle 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be D) By using a dummy value of 23456 in the 16-bit AS aggregator field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
2 months ago
I agree with Leanna. It makes sense to use the AS4_Aggregator attribute for 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) With the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but using the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's option B. The 32-bit AS numbers use the same method as 16-bit, but with the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
Audry
2 months ago
Exactly, using the AS4_Aggregator attribute is how the aggregator attribute is handled with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 months ago
So, it's not the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but it involves the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The AS4_Aggregator attribute is used with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
2 months ago
I think you're right, option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel