BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-184 Topic 5 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-184 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Dallas at Sep 15, 2024, 03:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Melita
19 days ago
Wait, is 'Epsilon' the name of a node or some kind of magical cluster unicorn? I need to brush up on my networking lingo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
20 days ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. Verifying HA first is always a good idea when making cluster changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
21 days ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. Guess I'll have to read up more on cluster management.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
4 days ago
Moving Epsilon to cluster1-02 doesn't seem necessary for node removal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
8 days ago
A) Verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner, then remove the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
10 days ago
We can make the node ineligible first, then remove it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
12 days ago
Let's check if high availability is configured before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
1 months ago
Option C is interesting, but moving Epsilon might not be necessary if you're just removing a single node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 months ago
Hmm, Option D doesn't sound right. Removing a node without proper preparation could disrupt the cluster's quorum.
upvoted 0 times
Ammie
12 days ago
I agree with you, User1. Option B also seems like a necessary step to make the node ineligible before removing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
1 months ago
I think Option A is the correct one. We should verify high availability before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krystina
1 months ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. Making the node ineligible before removing it seems like the safest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Audry
20 days ago
So, we should go with option B then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
25 days ago
Definitely, it's always best to take precautions before removing a node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
1 months ago
I agree, making the node ineligible first seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
2 months ago
I believe option D is also correct. After removing the node, the cluster needs to elect a new master to maintain quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
2 months ago
I agree with Georgeanna. Option B doesn't make sense because we should remove the node after ensuring failover to the HA partner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
I think option A is correct because we need to ensure high availability before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel