BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

MuleSoft Exam MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance Topic 7 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for MuleSoft's MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 7
[All MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance Questions]

A mule application designed to fulfil two requirements

a) Processing files are synchronously from an FTPS server to a back-end database using VM intermediary queues for load balancing VM events

b) Processing a medium rate of records from a source to a target system using batch job scope

Considering the processing reliability requirements for FTPS files, how should VM queues be configured for processing files as well as for the batch job scope if the application is deployed to Cloudhub workers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nan at Apr 08, 2024, 02:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Christiane
5 months ago
That makes sense. It ensures reliability for processing files while optimizing performance for batch job scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
5 months ago
I believe option C is the most suitable. Using Cloud hub persistent VM queues for FTPS files and disabling VM queue for batch job scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
So, which option do you think is the best for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
5 months ago
I agree, we need to consider the reliability requirements for FTPS files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
I think VM queues should be configured differently for FTPS file processing and batch job scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
5 months ago
I suggest using Cloud hub persistent queues for FTPS files and disabling VM queues for the batch job scope
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
6 months ago
That could be a good point, but we need to consider the batch job scope as well
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
6 months ago
But wouldn't using Cloud hub persistent VM queues be better for FTPS file processing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
6 months ago
I agree with Arthur, it seems like the most reliable option
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
6 months ago
I think we should use Cloud hub persistent queues for FTPS file processing
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
6 months ago
Yes, there is no need to configure VM queues for the batch jobs scope as it uses the worker's disc by default
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
But what about the batch job scope? Should we disable VM queues for that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
I agree, Cloud hub persistent queues would be the best option for FTPS file processing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theola
7 months ago
Exactly, Lorrine. Persistent queues will make sure the files are not lost if there are any issues during processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
7 months ago
Okay, that makes sense. Now, for the FTPS file processing, it seems like we need to use persistent VM queues on Cloudhub to ensure reliable processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
7 months ago
You're right, Lonna. The question mentions that the batch job scope uses the worker's disc by default. So we don't need to configure any VM queues for that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the batch job part. Isn't the default behavior for Mule batch jobs to use the worker's disc for VM queueing? We might need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
7 months ago
I agree, this is a tricky one. We need to think about how to configure the VM queues to handle the FTPS file processing and the batch job scope effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
7 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of Mule application design and deployment on Cloudhub. The requirements mention FTPS file processing and a batch job, so we need to consider the reliability and performance aspects for each.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel