BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

MuleSoft Exam MCD-Level1-Delta Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for MuleSoft's MCD-Level1-Delta exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All MCD-Level1-Delta Questions]

A Mule project contains a DataWeave module called MyModule.dwl that defines a function named formatString. The module is located in the project's src/main/resources/modules folder.

What is the correct way in DataWeave code to import MyModule using a wildcard and then call the module's formatString function?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Berry
4 months ago
I think the examiners might prefer us to explicitly import modules to demonstrate clear understanding of module dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
That's a good point. It might be safer to explicitly import the module to avoid any confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
4 months ago
Actually, I think using a wildcard import can lead to potential naming conflicts if there are multiple modules with the same function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
I'm not sure if using a wildcard import is the best practice though. Maybe we should explicitly import the module?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
I agree, importing modules with a wildcard makes it easier to access functions from multiple modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
5 months ago
I think we can import MyModule using a wildcard like this: import modules::*(MyModule) and then call the formatString function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
5 months ago
I prefer importing specific modules too. It keeps the code more transparent and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
5 months ago
That's a valid point. It could lead to confusion in larger projects. Maybe importing specific modules would be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
But wouldn't importing using a wildcard make it harder to track where the functions are coming from?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
6 months ago
Yes, that sounds correct. It would make the code more concise and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
6 months ago
I think we can import MyModule using '*' and then call the formatString function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
7 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if we can even skip the `import` statement altogether and just call the function directly using the relative path. That would be the ultimate in conciseness!
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
7 months ago
Haha, now you're really reaching! I don't think that's going to fly, but it's worth a shot I suppose.
upvoted 0 times
Rickie
6 months ago
MyModule::formatString()
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
6 months ago
import * from modules::MyModule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I wonder if we need to use the `import` keyword or if there's a different way to access the module's functions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel