Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam SC-100 Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 3
[All SC-100 Questions]

Your company has an Azure subscription that has enhanced security enabled for Microsoft Defender for Cloud.

The company signs a contract with the United States government.

You need to review the current subscription for NIST 800-53 compliance.

What should you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/update-regulatory-compliance-packages#what-regulatory-compliance-standards-are-available-in-defender-for-cloud


by Davida at Nov 13, 2024, 02:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Clorinda
1 months ago
I just hope the answer isn't 'all of the above', because that would make my head spin like a top!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 months ago
I'm torn between A and D, but I'll go with D. Gotta love those compliance standards, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Carri
17 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Let's make sure we're on track with compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
28 days ago
User 1: I think we should review the secure score recommendations first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannette
1 months ago
I'm going with C. Reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report would give a good starting point to assess the current compliance status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
B seems like the way to go. Configuring the Defender for Cloud data connector in Sentinel would be crucial for compliance monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
Peggie
20 days ago
User 4: Adding a regulatory compliance standard in Defender for Cloud could also help with NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
21 days ago
User 3: We should definitely review the Azure security baseline for audit report as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
29 days ago
User 2: I agree, but configuring the Defender for Cloud data connector in Sentinel is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should review the secure score recommendations first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamae
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe we should also review the Azure security baseline for audit report to ensure full compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. Adding a regulatory compliance standard would be the first logical step to review NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
1 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to consider all options before determining the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 months ago
I see your point, but I think B might be the best option. Configuring the Microsoft Defender for Cloud data connector could provide valuable insights for NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
1 months ago
Actually, I believe the correct answer is A. Reviewing the secure score recommendations from Defender for Cloud would help assess compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 months ago
I think the answer is D. Adding a regulatory compliance standard would be the first logical step to review NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
2 months ago
I agree with Cammy, checking the secure score recommendations is a good starting point for NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
I think we should review the secure score recommendations first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel