Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 8 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 8
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are designing a one-way integration from Microsoft Dataverse to another system.

You must use an Azure Function to update the other system. The integration must send only newly created records to the other system. The solution must support scenarios where a component of the integration is unavailable for more than a few seconds to avoid data loss.

You need to design the integration solution.

Solution: Register a webhook in the Dataverse instance that connects to the Azure Function. Register a step on the webhook which runs synchronously on the record's Create message and in the post-operation stage.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cortney
11 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe a hybrid approach with both synchronous and asynchronous components would be better to handle component unavailability. We could use the webhook to trigger the Azure Function, but then have the Function queue the data for processing later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Doesn't the requirement mention that the solution should support scenarios where a component of the integration is unavailable for more than a few seconds? I'm wondering if a synchronous approach is the best way to handle that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
11 months ago
Ah, I see what you're getting at. That would be a more resilient solution. We don't want to lose any data if the connection to the other system goes down for a bit. Queuing the data for later processing is a smart way to address that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
Good call! Batching the records would be a great way to optimize the performance of the integration. We don't want the Azure Function to get bogged down and cause delays in the data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
My
11 months ago
Agreed. Batching the records will help prevent overload and keep the integration running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
11 months ago
It's important to optimize performance when integrating systems to ensure seamless data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
11 months ago
This solution seems to meet the goal of sending only newly created records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
11 months ago
We need to make sure there are no delays in updating the other system to avoid data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
11 months ago
Exactly, by running synchronously on the Create message, we can capture the new records immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
11 months ago
Great idea! This will ensure only newly created records are sent to the other system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
11 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel