BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 7 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 7
[All PL-400 Questions]

A company designs a solution for use in an international organization.

The solution must provide multiple Ul languages and currencies.

You need to move components to include them as part of the solution.

Which three component types can you move? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Diane
6 months ago
I agree with Gracie, those components will ensure the solution is flexible and user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
That makes sense, those components are essential for international use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
6 months ago
I believe we can move custom entity, currencies enabled in the environment, and available Ul languages as part of the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
I think we need to include multiple Ul languages and currencies in the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
7 months ago
Right? That's a hard pass from me. I'll stick with the safe bets - cus entities, currencies, and UI languages. Can't go wrong with those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
7 months ago
Haha, yeah no kidding. 'Hey, we had to modify your standard security role to make this work.' I'm sure that would go over real well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
7 months ago
I agree with you both. Those three options make the most sense. Although, I have to say, 'modified standard security role' just sounds like a recipe for disaster. Can you imagine trying to explain that one to the client?
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
6 months ago
Can you imagine trying to explain that one to the client?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
6 months ago
'modified standard security role' just sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
6 months ago
I agree with you both. Those three options make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
6 months ago
E) available Ul languages
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
6 months ago
B) modified standard security role
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
6 months ago
A) custom entity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolland
7 months ago
Yep, that's what I was thinking too. Those seem to be the components that would be relevant for a solution needing to support multiple languages and currencies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel