Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 6 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 6
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company requires custom validation when users save form records that use a synchronous plug-in.

If validation fails, a message that explains how to resolve the issue must be displayed on the form to the user.

You need to implement the custom validation.

Solution: Include the message in the output parameters of the plug-in.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Winfred at May 31, 2024, 12:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Huey
5 months ago
The solution looks good to me. It's a clean way to provide the user with the necessary information to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Wouldn't it be better to have a separate, dedicated error handling mechanism instead of mixing it into the plug-in?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers are just gonna copy-paste this solution into all their plug-ins now. Gotta love those easy fixes!
upvoted 0 times
Felix
4 months ago
Haha, I bet they will!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
6 months ago
Seems like a valid solution to me. Keeping the validation logic and error message within the plug-in makes sense, as it's the most relevant place to handle the validation.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
6 months ago
I agree with Cassie, the message in the output parameters will help users understand how to resolve the validation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
6 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal because it includes the message in the output parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
6 months ago
Hmm, I think this solution might work. Displaying the error message in the plug-in's output parameters is a straightforward way to communicate the issue to the user.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
6 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
6 months ago
That sounds like a good approach. It will provide clear feedback to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
6 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel