Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 6 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 6
[All PL-400 Questions]

You are implementing business logic for a model-driven app form by using multiple JavaScript web resources.

The business logic number of JavaScript files, and the columns that the business logic requires are expected to change frequently. Some form fields will not be visible. Occasionally non-developers will also make changes to the form.

You need to prevent columns referenced by the JavaScript from accidentally being removed from the form based.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Winfred at May 31, 2024, 12:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Huey
9 months ago
The solution looks good to me. It's a clean way to provide the user with the necessary information to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
9 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Wouldn't it be better to have a separate, dedicated error handling mechanism instead of mixing it into the plug-in?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers are just gonna copy-paste this solution into all their plug-ins now. Gotta love those easy fixes!
upvoted 0 times
Felix
8 months ago
Haha, I bet they will!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
9 months ago
Seems like a valid solution to me. Keeping the validation logic and error message within the plug-in makes sense, as it's the most relevant place to handle the validation.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
8 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
9 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
10 months ago
I agree with Cassie, the message in the output parameters will help users understand how to resolve the validation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
10 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal because it includes the message in the output parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
10 months ago
Hmm, I think this solution might work. Displaying the error message in the plug-in's output parameters is a straightforward way to communicate the issue to the user.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
9 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
9 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
9 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
10 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
10 months ago
That sounds like a good approach. It will provide clear feedback to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
10 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel