BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 1 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 1
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Use the maker portal to export the custom connector. Then use the maker portal to import the connector into the production environment.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Marion at Aug 29, 2024, 04:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marjory
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think using the maker portal for export and import is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe there could be a better way to ensure visibility and accessibility only to users in the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
2 months ago
I agree with Marjory, it seems like the right approach to deploy the custom connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
2 months ago
This solution sounds straightforward, but I hope the exam doesn't ask us to 'move fast and break things' with our production environments!
upvoted 0 times
Tommy
1 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
I hope so too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Ah, the old 'move it to production and see what happens' strategy. Bold move, let's see how this plays out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
2 months ago
I think the solution is to export and import the custom connector using the maker portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
Wait, we can't just move it to production like that, can we? Shouldn't we test it first to make sure everything works as expected?
upvoted 0 times
Skye
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladis
3 months ago
Looks good to me! Exporting and importing the connector through the maker portal seems like a simple and effective way to get it deployed.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
1 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
2 months ago
That's correct. It's a straightforward process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lillian
3 months ago
This solution seems straightforward, but I wonder if there are any additional security considerations we need to take into account when moving the connector to production.
upvoted 0 times
Tamie
2 months ago
Yes, but we should also review the permissions and access controls to make sure everything is secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
Using the maker portal to export and import the connector seems like a good start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
Agreed, we need to ensure that only users in the tenant can access the connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
2 months ago
I think we should consider additional security measures before moving the connector to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel