New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-300 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 2
[All PL-300 Questions]

You use Power 81 Desktop to load data from a Microsoft SQL Server database.

While waiting for the data to load, you receive the following error.

You need to resolve the error.

What are two ways to achieve the goal? Each correct answer presents a complete solution

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Laticia
4 months ago
I feel like D could just complicate things more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
4 months ago
Wow, I didn't know splitting queries could make such a difference!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
4 months ago
Not sure about B, disabling query folding sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
4 months ago
Definitely agree with C, reducing rows and columns helps a lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
I think option A is a solid choice for handling long queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
5 months ago
Combining queries doesn't sound right for this situation. I feel like option D might not be the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where reducing the number of rows returned was key. Option C seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think disabling query folding might help with long-running queries. That sounds like option B, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I remember something about splitting queries to manage performance better, so maybe option A could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
5 months ago
Aha, I think I've got it! The client is using Basic authentication, but the server is expecting NTLM. That's the mismatch causing the 401 response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with RSA NetWitness, so I'll have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
5 months ago
I recall something about tenant names possibly being 128 characters, but I might be mixing it up with another system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this. The EDPB has been clear that derogations should only be used as a last resort and interpreted restrictively. So I'm going with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel