Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 4
[All PL-200 Questions]

You are creating a Power Automate cloud flow. The cloud flow will create several SharePoint Online list items based on a variety of conditions.

If any of the dependent SharePoint Online actions fail, you must revert the changes while the automation runs.

You need to design the cloud flow to meet the requirement.

Which two actions should you implement for the design? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Youlanda at Jan 25, 2025, 11:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Nobuko
10 days ago
I'm not sure about performing a changeset request action or retriggering the flow run though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
11 days ago
B and C, for sure. Anything else and you might as well just throw your laptop out the window. Though, I do wonder if the SharePoint team had one too many lattes when they came up with this requirement. Gotta love those creative developers, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
12 days ago
Yes, setting Run After to Has failed can help in reverting changes if any action fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
15 days ago
Should we also set Run After to Has failed for the dependent actions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
17 days ago
I agree, adding a scope can help manage the actions and conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
17 days ago
Option A? Really? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. B and C all the way, my dudes. Gotta keep that data integrity on lock.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
22 days ago
This is an interesting one. I'm gonna have to go with B and C too. The scope is clutch for that rollback functionality, and the changeset keeps everything tidy. Although, I do wonder if the flow will get a little confused if it has to revert its own actions. Maybe that's just me being paranoid though.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
1 days ago
User2: Yeah, the scope will help with rollback and the changeset keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 days ago
User1: I agree, adding a scope and performing a changeset request action seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terina
1 months ago
I think we should add a scope to the cloud flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D - retrigger the flow run? Feels like that could just make a bigger mess if things are already going wrong. B and C seem like the safer bet to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
1 months ago
I think option B and C are the way to go. Gotta love that scope action to group those SharePoint changes together, and the changeset request will make sure everything gets reverted if anything fails. Solid solution!
upvoted 0 times
Felix
2 days ago
User 3: Good point, the scope and changeset request actions are key to handling any failures in the SharePoint Online list item creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
3 days ago
User 2: Definitely, those two actions will ensure that the automation runs smoothly and reverts changes if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 days ago
User 1: I agree, using a scope to group the SharePoint changes and a changeset request action to revert if anything fails is a solid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel