Microsoft MD-102 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MD-102 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 1

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the groups shown in the following table.

You create a Conditional Access policy named CAPolicy1 that will block access to Microsoft Exchange Online from iOS devices. You assign CAPolicy1 to Group1.

You discover that User1 can still connect to Exchange Online from an iOS device.

You need to ensure that CAPolicy1 is enforced.

What should you do?

AConfigure a new terms of use (TOU).

BAssign CAPolicy1 to Group2.

CEnable CAPolicy1

DAdd a condition in CAPolicy1 to filter for devices.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Common signals that Conditional Access can take in to account when making a policy decision include the following signals:

* User or group membership

Policies can be targeted to specific users and groups giving administrators fine-grained control over access.

* Device

Users with devices of specific platforms or marked with a specific state can be used when enforcing Conditional Access policies.

Use filters for devices to target policies to specific devices like privileged access workstations.

* Etc.

by Hermila at May 28, 2023, 07:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MD-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Crista

3 months ago

Adding conditions is key, I agree!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

3 months ago

Wait, can we really filter by device type in policies?

upvoted 0 times

...

Narcisa

4 months ago

I thought blocking by group was enough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

4 months ago

Definitely, just assigning it isn't enough!

upvoted 0 times

...

Providencia

4 months ago

You need to enable CAPolicy1 for it to work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andrew

4 months ago

I definitely studied about terms of use, but I don't think that's relevant here. It seems like enabling the policy or adjusting the conditions is more important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

5 months ago

I feel like there might be a device filtering option that could help. Adding a condition sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

5 months ago

I think I practiced a similar question where assigning policies to the correct groups was crucial. Maybe Group2 is the right choice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

5 months ago

I remember something about Conditional Access policies needing to be enabled, but I'm not sure if that's the only step needed here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

5 months ago

Capacity requirements planning, that's the one! I remember learning about that in class. It's used to determine the capacity needed to meet the production plan. I'm confident that's the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of testing, but I'm not entirely clear on how "lessons learned" specifically fits in. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

5 months ago

I've got a good feeling about option B, DoD 7950.1-M. That sounds like it could be the right directive, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the details of the scenario and the potential attacks that could be avoided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

5 months ago

Wait, is this a memory thing? I'm not totally sure, but the number seems oddly specific. I'll narrow it down to 81 or 83.

upvoted 0 times

...