Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-500 Topic 3 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 3
[All MB-500 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution. Determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You must create a new attribute class in which to mark other classes in the ISV solution and their respective methods with the error levels Warning and Error. You have the following class: the numbers are included for reference only.)

You need 10 ensure that the compiler will report an error if code calls the bike method.

Solution:

Create the following attribute class:

Insert the following code at line 04:

Does The solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Madonna
1 months ago
This solution seems pretty simple and elegant. The 'CannotCallBike' attribute should do the job nicely. Now, if only the exam questions were as clear-cut as this one!
upvoted 0 times
Lino
10 days ago
Definitely, adding that attribute class is a clear way to prevent errors in the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
14 days ago
I think the solution will work, the attribute class is a good addition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
20 days ago
I agree, it's a smart way to ensure the compiler catches those mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
21 days ago
That attribute class should definitely help catch any errors calling the bike method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remona
2 months ago
Well, the solution looks straightforward enough. If the goal is to ensure the compiler reports an error when the bike method is called, then this should do the trick. I'm curious to see if there are any other approaches that could achieve the same result.
upvoted 0 times
Precious
18 days ago
Creating a new attribute class seems like the most efficient way to handle this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
29 days ago
I think option A) Yes is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 months ago
I agree, the solution seems clear and should work as intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
2 months ago
Haha, looks like the developers are trying to get creative with their error handling. I hope this 'CannotCallBike' attribute doesn't cause any unintended consequences down the line!
upvoted 0 times
Roy
27 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 months ago
I hope so too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
2 months ago
The solution seems to be on the right track, but I'm not sure if it will actually prevent the compiler from reporting an error when the bike method is called. I'll have to double-check the syntax and implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
Aja
24 days ago
User 3: Let's double-check to make sure the compiler will report an error when the bike method is called.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
26 days ago
User 2: I'm not so sure, I need to verify the syntax and implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
User 1: I think the solution is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
3 months ago
But the new attribute class clearly marks the classes with the error levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
3 months ago
I disagree, I don't think the solution is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
3 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel