Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-500 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

You have an enumeration named truckStatus that has the following statuses:* Empty* Loaded* CompletedYou have the following code:You need to extend this (enumeration and add the following statuses to the enumeration: Quarantine, InTransit. You must then modify code that validates the switch statement.Solution: Add a new case statement in the model of the existing code.Does the solution meet the goal?
B) No
A) Yes

Microsoft MB-500 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All MB-500 Questions]

You have an enumeration named truckStatus that has the following statuses:

* Empty

* Loaded

* Completed

You have the following code:

You need to extend this (enumeration and add the following statuses to the enumeration: Quarantine, InTransit. You must then modify code that validates the switch statement.

Solution: Add a new case statement in the model of the existing code.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Natalie at Jan 26, 2025, 03:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katy
8 months ago
New statuses need proper checks, not just a case!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
8 months ago
I think it should work if the cases are handled correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure that’s all it takes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
9 months ago
Totally agree, it needs more than that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
9 months ago
Just adding a case statement isn't enough for validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
9 months ago
I’m pretty confident that just adding cases won’t be enough, but I can’t recall the exact details from my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 months ago
I feel like the solution might not be complete; we might need to handle the new statuses in the validation logic too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
9 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to update an enumeration, and it involved more than just adding cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
I think adding a new case statement is necessary, but I'm not sure if it covers all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
Ugh, I hate working with enumerations. They always feel so rigid and inflexible. And modifying existing code is always a bit nerve-wracking, you know? I'll give it my best shot, but I'm not feeling super great about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
10 months ago
No problem, I've got this. Adding new statuses to an enumeration is pretty straightforward, and updating the switch statement to match is just a matter of adding a new case. I'll make sure to test it thoroughly, but I'm confident I can get this done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks a bit tricky. I'm not totally sure how to approach this one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and make sure I understand the existing implementation before I try to modify it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking me to extend the enumeration and modify the code that validates the switch statement. I think I can handle this - I just need to add the new statuses to the enumeration and then update the switch statement to include them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
1 year ago
I agree with Jodi, the solution needs to modify the code that validates the switch statement to fully meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
1 year ago
No, the solution does not meet the goal because it does not modify the code that validates the switch statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
I think the solution is correct because it adds the new statuses to the enumeration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 year ago
Yes, the solution adds the new statuses Quarantine and InTransit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 year ago
The solution seems straightforward, but I'd want to make sure the new statuses are properly documented and tested before approving it.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 year ago
Absolutely, it's always better to be thorough in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
1 year ago
That's a good point, documentation and testing are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claudio
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the developer who wrote this code was having a bad day. Quarantine, really? What is this, a COVID-themed truck simulator?
upvoted 0 times
Johna
1 year ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
1 year ago
Haha, maybe the developer was just trying to stay relevant with current events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edwin
2 years ago
I'm not sure if this is the best solution. Shouldn't we also update the enumeration itself to include the new statuses?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 years ago
The solution looks good, adding the new cases to the switch statement seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
1 year ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
The solution meets the goal by adding the new cases to the switch statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
1 year ago
The solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel