Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-330 Topic 2 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 2
[All MB-330 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A process manufacturer is implementing Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management to produce sports energy bars, beverages, and nutritional supplements.

The company must run a series of quality control tests for all its beverage items for each production run after the items are completed from a production job.

The testing process for all beverages must follow the same process. The energy bars and nutritional supplements have their own testing requirements.

The specific tests are not yet defined.

You need to configure the quality associations in preparation for the requirements.

Solution: Create a quality association for each item with Reference type as Inventory, using Item code as Table and specifying each item on the quality associations. Set Event type to Registered. Set Execution to Before.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bobbye
12 days ago
I bet the quality control team is going to have a field day with all these 'quality' energy bars. Let's hope they don't find any 'surprises' in the beverages!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
13 days ago
I agree with Percy, the solution seems to be on the right track by creating quality associations for each item.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
17 days ago
This is a good starting point, but I'd like to see some more details on how the quality associations will handle the specific testing requirements for each product type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
20 days ago
Hmm, I don't know. Specifying each item on the quality associations seems a bit tedious. There's got to be a more efficient way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
6 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francene
20 days ago
I disagree, I think the solution does not meet the goal because it only specifies the Event type and Execution, but does not define the specific tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
25 days ago
Before execution is a good call, but I wonder if we should also consider after execution for certain tests. Wouldn't want any issues to slip through.
upvoted 0 times
Adding after execution testing will help us catch any issues that may arise post-production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
20 hours ago
Yes, we should definitely add after execution testing to cover all bases and ensure quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
13 days ago
I think the solution provided covers only before execution, so we might need to consider additional configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
16 days ago
I agree, we should consider both before and after execution for certain tests to ensure quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Percy
30 days ago
Yes, I think the solution meets the goal because it creates quality associations for each item with specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
1 months ago
The solution seems reasonable, but I'm not sure if it covers all the testing requirements for the different product categories. Might need to look into that a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Herschel
19 days ago
User 2: I'm not so sure, we might need to look into it a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
23 days ago
User 1: I think the solution covers all the testing requirements for the different product categories.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel