Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 1 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 1
[All MB-310 Questions]

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.

The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.

You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Darrin at Dec 09, 2024, 01:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lynette
1 months ago
Well, if the tax authorities are already set up, then D) is the way to go. Gotta love these straightforward configuration questions!
upvoted 0 times
Crissy
1 days ago
Absolutely, it's all about ensuring the system is configured correctly for accurate payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
7 days ago
That makes sense, setting up the jurisdiction is key for tax remittance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
25 days ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
1 months ago
This is a no-brainer! D) all the way. What kind of question is this anyway? My grandma could answer this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority. They're collecting the taxes, so they must be a customer, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kris
12 days ago
Actually, setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority is the best way to configure the system for tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
20 days ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to associate the vendor record to the tax authority since they are the ones receiving the payments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
23 days ago
Yes, you are correct. Setting up a customer record for the tax authority is the right step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
1 months ago
I think setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
1 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority. The tax authorities are like vendors, so this is the logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
8 days ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
10 days ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 months ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority. That's the only option that makes sense for remitting tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
Maricela
1 months ago
Yes, setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority is the correct way to remit tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 months ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
2 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rene
2 months ago
I think we should set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel