Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 1
[All MB-310 Questions]

You have implemented Dynamics 365 finance.

You must update the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.

You need to configure the fiscal year.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lakeesha at Sep 17, 2024, 12:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tashia
2 months ago
But option A makes more sense because it aligns with the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
2 months ago
Gotta love those tricky fiscal year questions. I'm confident C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Shala
1 months ago
User 4: Definitely, C is the way to go for updating the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
2 months ago
Yeah, C seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year in Dynamics 365 finance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 months ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
2 months ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
I think C is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 months ago
I think C is the correct option too. It makes sense to divide the period according to the quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tashia
3 months ago
I think we should choose option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B was just messing with us. Definitely going with C - it's the only one that makes sense for a 4-4-5 configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
3 months ago
B? Really? 13 months in a fiscal year? That's just crazy talk. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
Option D looks good to me. Adjusting the ending date of each period sounds like the simplest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
2 months ago
Let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
I agree, it's a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
2 months ago
Yeah, adjusting the ending date of each period seems like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magda
3 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
3 months ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it according to the quarterly configuration makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel