Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-240 Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-240 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 7
[All MB-240 Questions]

You are setting up assets for a customer.

The VP of Field Service wants to have greater visibility to all the serialized components of an asset in a hierarchical view.

Solution: You create an Asset Category and associate it with each component and use the Location Tree for viewing. Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Cordelia at Dec 04, 2024, 03:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Danilo
1 months ago
As long as the Asset Category can handle the level of detail needed, this sounds like a solid approach. Sometimes the simple solutions are the best.
upvoted 0 times
Kate
4 days ago
No, we might need a more complex solution to meet the VP's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
12 days ago
I agree, keeping it simple is usually the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
20 days ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elden
1 months ago
I think we should explore other options as well, just to make sure we are providing the best solution for the VP's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
1 months ago
I agree with Staci, having an Asset Category and using the Location Tree will make it easier for the VP to see all the serialized components in a hierarchical view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
1 months ago
I disagree, I don't think just creating an Asset Category and using the Location Tree is enough for the VP to have greater visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
2 months ago
Yes, I think creating an Asset Category and using the Location Tree will provide the VP with the visibility they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the VP is just trying to keep tabs on all the components before they mysteriously 'disappear' from the field.
upvoted 0 times
Glennis
1 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 months ago
No
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
1 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
2 months ago
This seems like a reasonable solution, but I'd want to double-check that the Asset Category can truly capture all the details the VP is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't the Location Tree be more for physical locations rather than the component hierarchy?
upvoted 0 times
Lourdes
1 months ago
I think the Location Tree can still work for component hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
2 months ago
Definitely yes! The hierarchical view of serialized components sounds like a perfect fit for the VP's request.
upvoted 0 times
Chu
1 months ago
Yes, it will definitely make it easier for the VP to track all the serialized components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
2 months ago
That sounds like a good plan. The VP will appreciate the increased visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
2 months ago
Great, I will go ahead and set up the Asset Category and associate it with each component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
2 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel