Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-240 Topic 11 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-240 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 11
[All MB-240 Questions]

You are implementing a Microsoft Dynamics 365 Field Service solution for a client

The client needs to be able to view the Parent Asset and Master Asset when the Primary Incident Customer Asset is associated to a work order. The asset data should not be stored directly on the work order. It should only be visible when the Customer Asset is selected.

Solution:

1. Create the Parent Asset and Master Asset on the work order.

2. Use Microsoft Power Automate to populate fields when the Customer Asset contains data.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kiera at Jul 09, 2024, 06:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bulah
7 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher, isn't it? I mean, who would ever think of storing asset data directly on the work order? That's like trying to fit an elephant in a shoebox. Power Automate is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
7 months ago
No
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
7 months ago
Exactly! Storing asset data directly on the work order would be a mess. Power Automate is definitely the better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
7 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
8 months ago
I'd give this a big ol' 'No' - storing the asset data directly on the work order is just asking for trouble down the line. Power Automate is the way to go, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
8 months ago
Option 2 is the answer here. Using Power Automate to populate the fields is a much cleaner solution that meets the client's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
7 months ago
Great, it's important to meet the client's needs efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
7 months ago
I agree, using Power Automate will ensure the asset data is only visible when the Customer Asset is selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
7 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
8 months ago
That's true, but creating the assets directly on the work order may not be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
8 months ago
But by using Power Automate to populate fields, it ensures the data is only visible when the Customer Asset is selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
8 months ago
Nah, this won't work. The requirement clearly states the asset data shouldn't be stored on the work order. Option 2 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Francene
7 months ago
Yes, using Power Automate to populate fields when the Customer Asset is selected is the correct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
7 months ago
I agree, storing the asset data directly on the work order is not the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
Option 2 is the best choice. It meets the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
7 months ago
Yes, that meets the goal of not storing asset data directly on the work order.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
8 months ago
Agreed, using Power Automate to populate fields is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
8 months ago
Option 2 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
8 months ago
I disagree, I don't think it meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
9 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel