Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-210 Topic 2 Question 112 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-210 exam
Question #: 112
Topic #: 2
[All MB-210 Questions]

You need to add the unfavorable credit and reference check reasons to the RFQ close process. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Dolores at Jan 09, 2025, 07:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-210 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Salome
2 months ago
Hah, I bet the sellers would love a solution that involves less code. Option B is probably the way to go, unless they really want to get their hands dirty with a plug-in.
upvoted 0 times
Sue
15 days ago
D: It's important to streamline the process for the sellers, so Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
18 days ago
C: I agree, having a new duplicate detection rule for leads would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 months ago
B: Yeah, it would definitely make things easier for the sellers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 months ago
D: That sounds like a plan. It should help streamline the process for the sellers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 months ago
C: Option B it is then. Let's go with creating a new duplicate detection rule for leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 months ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It would make it easier for the sellers to avoid duplicate records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
1 months ago
A: Option B sounds like the best choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
A: Option B sounds like the best choice for a low-code solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
2 months ago
Option D is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure it's the most efficient solution. A custom duplicate detection plug-in might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
2 months ago
Hmm, I think Option C might be the best choice here. Creating a new duplicate detection rule for contacts could help catch any potential issues at the source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
2 months ago
I'm not sure why they wouldn't just go with Option A and update the existing duplicate detection rule for leads. Seems like a simpler fix to me.
upvoted 0 times
Dianne
2 months ago
I agree, updating the existing rule for leads seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
2 months ago
Option A) Update the leads with the same email address duplicate detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caitlin
3 months ago
I disagree. I believe updating the leads with the same email address rule would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
3 months ago
I agree with Joni. It makes sense to have a specific rule for leads to avoid duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
Option B seems to be the way to go. Creating a new duplicate detection rule for leads would be the most straightforward solution to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Karon
2 months ago
Definitely. It's a simple and effective solution for the sellers to proactively identify duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to have a specific rule for leads to avoid any confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. It would definitely help with the duplicate records issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
B) Create a new duplicate detection rule for leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
3 months ago
I think we should create a new duplicate detection rule for leads.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel