Option D, huh? Reading and writing from multiple tables? That's like trying to juggle a bunch of balls while riding a unicycle - it's possible, but it's gonna be a real challenge. I don't know, I think I'd rather go with something a little more straightforward, like option B.
You know, I was leaning towards option C at first, but then I realized that reading from a single table and writing to multiple tables? That's like trying to pour water into a bunch of different cups at the same time. It's just gonna get everywhere, and it's not gonna be efficient at all. I think B is the way to go.
Hmm, let's see here. I think option B makes the most sense. Reading from multiple tables and writing to a single table? That's the perfect way to consolidate all the chaos into one neat, tidy package. Plus, it's gotta be faster than trying to keep track of all those different tables, am I right?
A fully denormalized database? Oh man, that's gonna be a wild ride! Reading and writing data in a single table? That's like trying to cram an entire buffet into one plate - it's gonna get messy, but hey, at least it's efficient, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Lizette
2 months agoDeangelo
2 months agoGenevieve
2 months agoLuis
2 months agoRuthann
2 months agoGerald
3 months agoVicente
3 months agoRuthann
4 months agoGerald
4 months agoEttie
5 months agoEleni
5 months agoLashandra
4 months agoBenedict
4 months agoSarina
4 months agoCeleste
4 months agoLinette
4 months agoClaribel
4 months agoTony
4 months agoArmando
5 months agoEsteban
5 months ago