Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam DP-700 Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-700 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All DP-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Fabric eventstream that loads data into a table named Bike_Location in a KQL database. The table contains the following columns:

You need to apply transformation and filter logic to prepare the data for consumption. The solution must return data for a neighbourhood named Sands End when No_Bikes is at least 15. The results must be ordered by No_Bikes in ascending order.

Solution: You use the following code segment:

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This code does not meet the goal because this is an SQL-like query and cannot be executed in KQL, which is required for the database.

Correct code should look like:


by Frank at Jan 09, 2025, 02:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Fletcher
13 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of whether to order by ascending or descending. The answer is simple: whichever way makes the data most useful for the end user. Unless they're a bike thief, in which case they'll want the neighbourhoods with the least bikes.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
1 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
13 days ago
I think the code segment meets the goal, so I would also choose A) Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
19 days ago
This is a trick question, isn't it? There's gotta be a catch somewhere. Maybe the data is updated in real-time and the results change by the time we run the query.
upvoted 0 times
Earnestine
4 days ago
This is a trick question, isn't it? There's gotta be a catch somewhere. Maybe the data is updated in real-time and the results change by the time we run the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
8 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brynn
24 days ago
Wait, why are we ordering by No_Bikes in ascending order? Shouldn't we want the neighbourhoods with the most bikes at the top?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
26 days ago
I don't know, the code looks a little too simple. Are we sure it covers all the requirements? What if there are other neighbourhoods with at least 15 bikes?
upvoted 0 times
Samira
18 days ago
User 1: I think the code might be too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elroy
28 days ago
I agree with Sherita, the code segment orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 months ago
Yes, because the code segment filters data for Sands End with at least 15 bikes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
1 months ago
The code segment looks good to me. It filters the data for the Sands End neighbourhood and orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order. Seems like it meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
Herman
23 days ago
The code segment looks good to me. It filters the data for the Sands End neighbourhood and orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order. Seems like it meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
24 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel