Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam DP-600 Topic 4 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-600 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 4
[All DP-600 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Fabric tenant that contains a semantic model named Model1.

You discover that the following query performs slowly against Model1.

You need to reduce the execution time of the query.

Solution: You replace line 4 by using the following code:

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Evangelina at Dec 08, 2024, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-600 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Margarita
3 months ago
Ah, the joys of optimizing queries. At least it's not as painful as trying to decipher the output of a quantum computer.
upvoted 0 times
Margarita
2 months ago
Oh, too bad. Maybe there's another solution that could work better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 months ago
No
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 months ago
Great! That should definitely help speed up the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
3 months ago
I'd give it a shot, but I'm still wondering if there's a more elegant solution out there. Maybe a data scientist can chime in with some machine learning magic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
3 months ago
This seems like a solid approach. As long as the index is properly maintained, this should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
3 months ago
Great, let's give it a try and see if it improves performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
3 months ago
I think so too. It should help speed up the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
3 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
4 months ago
Hmm, not sure if this is the best solution. Might be worth exploring other options like table partitioning or query rewriting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
4 months ago
The query optimization looks good. The replacement of line 4 should improve the execution time by leveraging the index.
upvoted 0 times
Martina
3 months ago
User 3: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
3 months ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
4 months ago
I'm not sure, we should test it first before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
4 months ago
But the new code looks optimized, it should reduce the execution time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
4 months ago
I disagree, I don't think the solution will work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
4 months ago
I think the solution provided will meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel