Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-600 Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-600 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All DP-600 Questions]

Note: This section contains one or more sets of questions with the same scenario and problem. Each question presents a unique solution to the problem. You must determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. More than one solution in the set might solve the problem. It is also possible that none of the solutions in the set solve the problem.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return. As a result, these questions do not appear on the Review Screen.

Your network contains an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain named contoso.com that syncs with a Microsoft Entra tenant by using Microsoft Entra Connect.

You have a Fabric tenant that contains a semantic model.

You enable dynamic row-level security (RLS) for the model and deploy the model to the Fabric service.

You query a measure that includes the username () function, and the query returns a blank result.

You need to ensure that the measure returns the user principal name (UPN) of a user.

Solution: You update the measure to use the USEROBJECT () function.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Donte
1 months ago
This is like trying to bake a cake with a hammer instead of a whisk. The USEROBJECT() function is not the right tool for the job. We need to find a solution that actually solves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
12 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
16 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
1 months ago
I agree with Starr, the USEROBJECT() function may not be the correct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
I'm sorry, but the USEROBJECT() function is not going to get us the UPN. That's like trying to use a wrench to put in a screw - it just won't work. We need to find a more suitable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Douglass
17 days ago
User 4: Let's explore other options to get the user principal name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
21 days ago
User 3: Maybe we can try another function instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
User 2: We should look for a different solution then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, USEROBJECT() won't give us the UPN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Starr
2 months ago
But using the USEROBJECT() function might not return the UPN as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
Hmm, using USEROBJECT() sounds like a good idea, but it's not going to give us the UPN. Looks like we need to dig a little deeper on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Pearline
16 days ago
Hmm, using USEROBJECT() sounds like a good idea, but it's not going to give us the UPN. Looks like we need to dig a little deeper on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
27 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
28 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Markus
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) No.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
The USEROBJECT() function is used to get information about the current user, but it doesn't return the user's UPN. The solution doesn't meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Starr
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel