Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam DP-203 Topic 1 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-203 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 1
[All DP-203 Questions]

You have an Azure Data Factory pipeline named pipeline1 that includes a Copy activity named Copy1. Copy1 has the following configurations:

* The source of Copy1 is a table in an on-premises Microsoft SQL Server instance that is accessed by using a linked service connected via a self-hosted integration runtime.

* The sink of Copy1 uses a table in an Azure SQL database that is accessed by using a linked service connected via an Azure integration runtime.

You need to maximize the amount of compute resources available to Copy1. The solution must minimize administrative effort.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ora at Mar 23, 2025, 08:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-203 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shakira
3 days ago
That's a good point, maybe we should consider scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
4 days ago
But wouldn't scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime also help in maximizing resources?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
4 days ago
Oh, this is a tricky one. I think I'll have to go with option B. Scaling up the Azure integration runtime's data flow runtime and scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime seems like the best way to get the most bang for your buck. And let's be honest, who doesn't love a good data center power play? *cue evil laughter*
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
7 days ago
I agree with Shakira, it will maximize the compute resources available to Copy1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
10 days ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime is the way to go. Who needs all that fancy Azure integration runtime stuff when you can just beef up your on-premises hardware? Plus, it's probably cheaper, right? *wink, wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
12 days ago
Hmm, I think I'd go with option B. Scaling up the Azure integration runtime's data flow runtime and scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime seems like the best way to maximize the compute resources without too much administrative effort. Gotta love those Azure resources, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
16 days ago
I think we should scale up the data flow runtime of the Azure integration runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel