Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 2

You have an on-premises DNS server named Server1 that hosts a primary DNS zone named fabrikam.com.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table.

Users on the on-premises network access resources on all the virtual networks by using a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN. You need to deploy an Azure DNS Private Resolver solution that meets the following requirements:

* Resources connected to the virtual networks must be able to resolve DNS names for fabrikam.com.

* Server1 must be able to resolve the DNS names of the resources in contoso.com.

* The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort.

What is the minimum number of resolvers you should deploy?

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Elin at Sep 18, 2024, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Adelaide

4 months ago

I bet the person who wrote this question has a secret love for DNS. The more resolvers, the merrier, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Beckie

4 months ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

4 months ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

4 months ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

5 months ago

Hold on, are we sure we need more than one resolver? I mean, why make things complicated when one should do the trick? I say A!

upvoted 0 times

Cristina

4 months ago

In this case, the minimum number of resolvers we should deploy is actually 2. So, the correct answer is B) 2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

4 months ago

I agree, deploying multiple resolvers would ensure that all the DNS name resolution requirements are met. So, the answer is not A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

4 months ago

I think we actually need more than one resolver to meet all the requirements. A single resolver might not be enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

5 months ago

I'm not sure, but it makes sense to have separate resolvers for each domain. So, I think the answer is B) 2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe D? Four resolvers just to be safe, you know, better safe than sorry!

upvoted 0 times

Felice

4 months ago

D) 4

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

4 months ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

4 months ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

4 months ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

5 months ago

I agree with Kris. Deploying 2 resolvers would meet the requirements and minimize costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mee

5 months ago

Wow, this is a tricky one! I'm going with C. Three resolvers to handle the different requirements.

upvoted 0 times

Maryanne

4 months ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

5 months ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

5 months ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

5 months ago

I think the answer is B) 2 because we need one resolver for fabrikam.com and one for contoso.com.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

5 months ago

I think the answer is B. Two resolvers should be deployed, one for each virtual network.

upvoted 0 times

Fannie

4 months ago

Yes, having two resolvers would allow for the necessary DNS resolution without unnecessary duplication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

4 months ago

It makes sense to have one resolver for each virtual network to minimize costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andree

4 months ago

I agree, deploying two resolvers would meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

4 months ago

I think the answer is B. Two resolvers should be deployed, one for each virtual network.

upvoted 0 times

...