BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 3 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You need to recommend a data storage solution that meets the following requirements:

* Ensures that applications can access the data by using a REST connection

* Hosts 20 independent tables of varying sizes and usage patterns

* Automatically replicates the data to a second Azure region

* Minimizes costs

What should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lashandra at Mar 20, 2024, 09:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Laura
5 months ago
That's a good point, Timothy. The requirement for applications to access data using a REST connection is a key factor in this decision
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I think option C, an Azure SQL database with active geo-replication, is the way to go. It provides both data replication and access via REST connection
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
That could be a valid point, Olive. Depending on the budget constraints, cost might be a deciding factor in this recommendation
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
5 months ago
But wouldn't option B, using tables in an Azure Storage account with read-access geo-redundant storage, be more cost-effective?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
6 months ago
I agree with you, Dean. Active geo-replication ensures data is replicated to a second Azure region for disaster recovery
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
6 months ago
I think option A, an Azure SQL Database elastic pool with active geo-replication, would be the best choice
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
7 months ago
You know, if we're really trying to minimize costs, I wonder if we could get away with a single Azure SQL Database instance and use active geo-replication to meet the replication requirement. That might be the most cost-effective solution, even if it's not as flexible as the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
7 months ago
I don't know, the REST access requirement makes me hesitant about going with just a storage account. Azure SQL Database might be a better fit there, even if it's a bit more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Azure Storage accounts with RA-GRS seem like they could meet the requirements, especially the automatic replication to a second region. Plus, it's probably cheaper than a full-blown Azure SQL Database solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. We need a solution that can handle a variety of table sizes and usage patterns, provide REST access, and automatically replicate the data, all while being cost-effective. That's a tall order!
upvoted 0 times
Pilar
6 months ago
Yeah, option A seems to be the best choice. It meets all the specified requirements and is cost-effective too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
6 months ago
A) an Azure SQL Database elastic pool that uses active geo-replication
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
6 months ago
I'm not sure if that would meet all the requirements. It might be better to go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
6 months ago
B) tables in an Azure Storage account that use read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS)
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
6 months ago
That sounds like a good option. It can handle different table sizes and usage patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
6 months ago
A) an Azure SQL Database elastic pool that uses active geo-replication
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel