Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-120 Topic 12 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 12
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You are designing an SAP HANA deployment.

You estimate that the database will be 1.8 TB in three years.

You need to ensure that the deployment supports 60,000 IOPS. The solution must minimize costs and provide the lowest latency possible.

Which type of disk should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kenny
11 months ago
You know, if we're really trying to minimize costs, maybe the Standard SSD is the way to go. I mean, how much of a difference can there really be between the Premium and Standard SSDs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. What about the Standard SSD? It might be a nice middle ground between cost and performance. Though the Premium SSD does seem like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
11 months ago
I agree, the Premium SSD seems like the best option here. Standard HDDs just won't cut it for the IOPS requirement, and the Ultra disk might be overkill and too expensive for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
Adela
11 months ago
Definitely, Standard HDD would not be able to handle the IOPS required. Standard SSD might be a good option as well, but Premium SSD seems like the best choice for our situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
11 months ago
Premium SSD provides the right balance of performance and cost. Ultra disk might be too much for what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
11 months ago
I think Premium SSD is the way to go too. Standard HDD definitely won't meet the IOPS needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
11 months ago
Premium SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. We need to ensure low latency and high IOPS, but also minimize costs. I'm leaning towards the Premium SSD, as it should provide the low latency we need while being more cost-effective than the Ultra disk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel