Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-104 Topic 3 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-104 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-104 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription that contains the virtual machines shown in the following table.

You deploy a load balancer that has the following configurations:

* Name: LB 1

* Type: Internal

* SKU: Standard

* Virtual network: VNET1

You need to ensure that you can add VM1 and VM2 to the backend pool of L81.

Solution: You create two Standard SKU public IP addresses and associate a Standard SKU public IP address to the network interface of each virtual machine.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Miesha at Jul 03, 2024, 05:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lino
1 months ago
I agree with Shenika. We should choose option B) No.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 months ago
Good point. Maybe we should reconsider the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 months ago
But do we really need public IP addresses for an internal load balancer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
1 months ago
Hold up, I think the solution is missing something. Shouldn't we be looking at the networking configuration of the VMs instead of just adding public IPs?
upvoted 0 times
Farrah
16 days ago
User 2: Yeah, just adding public IPs might not be enough to achieve the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
17 days ago
User 1: I agree, we should check the networking configuration of the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
2 months ago
Haha, public IP addresses for an internal load balancer? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
Ah, I see. The question states the load balancer is configured for the VNET1 virtual network, so adding public IP addresses doesn't seem necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
15 days ago
That makes sense. Option B is the correct choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
23 days ago
I agree with option B. Since the load balancer is internal, public IP addresses are not needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
26 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
27 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
2 months ago
I think the solution is to create public IP addresses for the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure this solution meets the goal. Doesn't an internal load balancer require the VMs to be in the same virtual network?
upvoted 0 times
Eura
1 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel