Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Linux Foundation Exam LFCA Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's LFCA exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 2
[All LFCA Questions]

An IT team needs to synchronize large amounts of data between two nodes on the company's local network. This data changes daily and it is not feasible to copy the entire directory tree each time. Which is the best option to securely copy files in the most timely and efficient manner?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alpha
10 months ago
I think fsync is not a suitable option because it is a command related to file I/O operations, not specifically for copying files over a network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
10 months ago
scp is secure, but it copies the entire file each time, which can be inefficient for large data sets that change frequently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about rsync. Can someone explain why scp wouldn't be a good choice for this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
I agree, rsync is a great option for this scenario. It saves time and bandwidth by only transferring the differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
10 months ago
I think the best option is rsync because it can efficiently synchronize only the changes in the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
10 months ago
I've heard of fsync, but I don't think it's the right choice for synchronizing daily changing data. rsync seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
11 months ago
I personally like scp because it's simple and secure, but I can see why rsync would be more efficient for synchronizing large amounts of data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
I agree with you, Nickole. rsync uses a delta transfer algorithm to only send the differences between source and destination files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
11 months ago
I think the best option would be rsync, it's designed for synchronizing files efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel