Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Linux Foundation Exam HFCP Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's HFCP exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All HFCP Questions]

What are the standard possibilities to configure parameters of a component (peer, orderer) in Hyperledger Fabric?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In Hyperledger Fabric, the standard possibilities to configure parameters of a component, such as a peer or orderer, include using YAML configuration files, environment variables, and command-line interface (CLI) flags. This approach provides flexibility and allows for detailed control over the parameters that govern the behavior of these components .


by Nidia at Aug 08, 2024, 08:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HFCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rickie
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense, as it allows for flexibility and ease of configuration using Yaml files, environment variables, and CLI commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
4 months ago
I believe option A is also a valid way to configure parameters, using local Linux config files and kubernetes configuration in etcd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
4 months ago
I agree with Yvonne, those options seem to be the most common ways to configure parameters in Hyperledger Fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I think the standard possibilities are Yaml config files, environment variables, flags on CLI commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate: local config or global database? Personally, I'm a fan of the Swiss Army knife approach in C. More tools, more fun!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
Individual config databases for each org? Sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'm with Twana on this one - keep it simple with C.
upvoted 0 times
Tesha
4 months ago
Definitely, having individual config databases for each organization could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Using yaml config files and environment variables is much simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willetta
5 months ago
I prefer individual configuration databases for each organization, it provides more control and customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
5 months ago
I believe using a global configuration database could also be a good option for storing all relevant parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
5 months ago
I agree with Vinnie, those options make sense for configuring parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
5 months ago
Kubernetes config in etcd, eh? Sounds like a lot of overhead just to set some parameters. I'll stick with the simpler approach in C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
5 months ago
Global config database? Nah, that's too centralized. Gotta go with the options that let us manage our own stuff.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
5 months ago
A) Local Linux config files and kubernetes configuration in etcd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
5 months ago
C) Yaml config files, environment variables, flags on CLI commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vinnie
5 months ago
I think the standard possibilities are Yaml config files, environment variables, flags on CLI commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
6 months ago
Hmm, looks like C is the way to go. Yaml configs, environment vars, and CLI flags - that's the flexibility we need!
upvoted 0 times
Mendy
5 months ago
CLI flags are handy for quick adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
Environment variables and CLI flags give us more control over configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
5 months ago
Yaml configs make it easy to manage parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
5 months ago
Environment variables are great for customizing configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
Yaml configs make it easy to manage settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
5 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most flexible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
5 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most flexible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel