You are configuring a Layer 3 VPN between two sites. You are configuring the vrf-target target : 65100:100 statement in your routing instance.
In this scenario, which two statements describe the vrf-target configuration? (Choose two.)
The `vrf-target` statement in a Layer 3 VPN configuration is used to control the import and export of VPN routes by attaching a target community to the routes. This helps in defining which VPN routes should be imported into or exported from a particular VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) instance.
1. **Understanding VRF Target**:
- The `vrf-target` statement specifies the extended community attributes (route targets) that are used to control the import and export of routes in a VRF.
- These attributes help in identifying which routes should be shared between different VRFs, particularly across different PE (Provider Edge) devices.
2. **Statements Analysis**:
- **A. This value is used to identify BGP routes learned from the local CE device.**
- Incorrect. The `vrf-target` attribute is not used to identify routes learned from the local CE device. It is used to manage routes between PE devices and within the provider's MPLS network.
- **B. This value is used to identify BGP routes learned from the remote PE device.**
- Correct. The `vrf-target` value helps in identifying which routes from remote PE devices should be imported into the local VRF. It essentially acts as a filter for importing BGP routes with matching target communities.
- **C. This value is used to add a target community to BGP routes advertised to the local CE device.**
- Incorrect. Routes advertised to the local CE device do not use the `vrf-target` attribute. Instead, these routes are typically managed within the local VRF routing table.
- **D. This value is used to add a target community to BGP routes advertised to the remote PE device.**
- Correct. When advertising routes from the local PE to remote PE devices, the `vrf-target` value is added to these routes. This target community ensures that the correct routes are shared across the VPN.
**Conclusion**:
The correct statements about the `vrf-target` configuration in a Layer 3 VPN scenario are:
**B. This value is used to identify BGP routes learned from the remote PE device.**
**D. This value is used to add a target community to BGP routes advertised to the remote PE device.**
**Reference**:
- Juniper Networks Documentation on VRF Target: [VRF Target Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/layer-3-vpns.html)
- MPLS and VPN Architectures by Ivan Pepelnjak and Jim Guichard
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, the PE-to-CE protocol being used is OSPF for the L3VPN. Also, there is an OSPF neighborship between CE-1 and CE-2.
Which statement is correct in this situation?
In the exhibit, the PE-to-CE protocol used is OSPF, and there is an OSPF neighborship between CE-1 and CE-2 within the same Area 0. Let's analyze the default OSPF routing behavior in this setup to determine the correct statement.
1. **OSPF Neighborship**:
- CE-1 and CE-2 have an OSPF neighborship directly within Area 0.
- OSPF prefers intra-area routes over inter-area and external routes.
2. **Default Routing Behavior**:
- Since CE-1 and CE-2 are directly connected through an OSPF link within the same area, OSPF will prefer this direct intra-area path over any other paths learned via the PE routers and the L3VPN.
- This is because intra-area routes have a lower metric compared to inter-area or external routes.
3. **Metric Considerations**:
- By default, OSPF will route traffic between Site-1 and Site-2 through the direct link between CE-1 and CE-2, unless the link's metric is artificially increased to make it less preferable.
- There is no need to adjust metrics for the CE-1 to PE-1 link to prefer the CE-1 to CE-2 path, as OSPF already prefers direct intra-area paths.
**Conclusion**:
Given the default behavior of OSPF and the topology shown in the exhibit, the correct statement is:
**B. Hosts at Site-1 will reach hosts at Site-2 through the CE-1 and CE-2 link by default.**
**Reference**:
- OSPF Design Guide: [Juniper Networks OSPF Design Guide](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ospf-design-overview.html)
- Juniper Networks Technical Documentation on OSPF: [Junos OS OSPF Configuration Guide](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ospf-routing-overview.html)
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
In the exhibit, the output of the `show route protocol bgp` command is shown for the prefix `172.16.20.4/30`. Let's analyze the provided BGP routing table to determine which statements are correct.
1. **AS Path Analysis**:
- The AS path for the route `172.16.20.4/30` is shown as `2 I`.
- This indicates that the route was learned from AS 2 and it is an internal (iBGP) route within the same AS.
2. **Multiple Paths**:
- The route has two next-hop IP addresses: `10.0.18.2` via interface `ge-1/0/4.0` and `10.0.19.2` via interface `ge-1/0/5.0`.
- This indicates that BGP multipath is configured, which allows multiple equal-cost paths to be used for load balancing.
- BGP multipath must be explicitly configured to use multiple paths for the same prefix.
3. **Multihop vs. Multipath**:
- **Multihop Configuration**: This is typically used for establishing BGP sessions with peers that are not directly connected. It is not related to load balancing.
- **Multipath Configuration**: This is used to enable load balancing across multiple paths for the same prefix, which is the case here.
**Conclusion**:
Given the above analysis:
- **C. This route is learned from the same AS number**: Correct. The AS path `2 I` indicates the route was learned from the same AS number (AS 2).
- **D. The multipath configuration is used for load balancing**: Correct. The presence of multiple next-hops indicates that BGP multipath is configured for load balancing.
Thus, the correct answers are:
**C. This route is learned from the same AS number.**
**D. The multipath configuration is used for load balancing.**
**Reference**:
- Junos OS BGP Multipath Documentation: [Junos OS BGP Multipath](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/bgp-multipath.html)
- Junos OS BGP Configuration Guide: [Junos OS BGP Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/bgp-routing-overview.html)
Which three statements about IS-IS in a multi-area network are correct? (Choose three.)
Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) is a link-state routing protocol designed to move information efficiently within a computer network, a group of physically connected computers or similar devices. It operates in two levels, Level 1 (L1) and Level 2 (L2), and supports hierarchical routing within a multi-area network.
Let's analyze each statement to determine its correctness in the context of IS-IS multi-area networks.
1. **Statement A: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
- This statement is correct. L1 PDUs (Protocol Data Units) are flooded within the L1 area and also to the L2 routers that are present in the same area. These L2 routers act as the boundary routers that connect the local L1 area to other L1 areas via L2.
2. **Statement B: External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**
- This statement is correct. L2 PDUs are flooded throughout the entire L2 backbone, which includes all L2 routers in different areas. This ensures that inter-area routing information is shared across the network.
3. **Statement C: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to all L1 routers in other areas.**
- This statement is incorrect. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded within the local L1 area. They do not cross L1 area boundaries; inter-area communication is handled by L2 routers.
4. **Statement D: Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**
- This statement is correct. Internal L1 PDUs are indeed only flooded within their local L1 area, and do not go beyond it.
5. **Statement E: External L2 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
- This statement is incorrect. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers throughout the IS-IS network, not just to those in the local area. This allows L2 routers to maintain a complete map of the network's topology.
**Conclusion**:
Given the analysis, the correct answers are:
**A. Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
**B. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**
**D. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**
**Reference**:
- Juniper Networks Documentation on IS-IS: [IS-IS Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/is-is-routing-overview.html)
- RFC 1195, Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual Environments: [RFC 1195](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1195) which details the operation of IS-IS in multi-area networks.
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, you must provide VRF Internet access over a single connection for VPN-A Site 1, which connects to PE-1.
Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
In the provided exhibit, the configuration involves using a RIB (Routing Information Base) group to facilitate internet access for VPN-A Site 1 through PE-1. The goal is to provide VRF Internet access over a single connection.
1. **Understanding RIB Groups**:
- RIB groups allow for the import and export of routes between different routing tables.
- In this scenario, we have two RIBs: `inet.0` (the main routing table) and `VPN-A.inet.0` (the VRF-specific routing table).
2. **Statement Analysis**:
- **A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
- Correct. To provide Internet access to VPN-A, the default route (0.0.0.0/0) learned via BGP in the `inet.0` table must be made available in the `VPN-A.inet.0` table. This is done using the RIB group to import the default route.
- **B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
- Correct. Interface routes (connected routes) are typically directly added to both the global and the VRF routing tables without needing a RIB group. These routes are known to the VRF because the interfaces are part of the VRF configuration.
- **C. You do not need to use the RIB group default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
- Incorrect. As discussed, the default route needs to be imported into the VRF's routing table using a RIB group to enable Internet access for the VRF.
- **D. You must use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
- Incorrect. Interface routes are directly associated with the VRF interfaces and are automatically known to the VRF routing table. There is no need to use a RIB group for these routes.
**Conclusion**:
The correct answers are:
**A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
**B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**
**Reference**:
- Juniper Networks Documentation on RIB Groups: [RIB Groups Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/rib-groups-overview.html)
- Junos OS VPNs Configuration Guide: [Junos VPNs Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vpns-overview.html)
Anglea
11 hours agoJin
12 days agoDelisa
15 days agoHayley
23 days agoAudry
28 days agoMalcom
29 days agoCatalina
1 months agoCordelia
1 months agoTamekia
2 months agoAlesia
2 months agoZona
3 months agoAdela
4 months agoDean
4 months agoNelida
4 months agoBuddy
4 months agoEvan
4 months agoFlo
5 months agoDomonique
5 months ago