Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you must provide VRF Internet access over a single connection for VPN-A Site 1, which connects to PE-1.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

In the provided exhibit, the configuration involves using a RIB (Routing Information Base) group to facilitate internet access for VPN-A Site 1 through PE-1. The goal is to provide VRF Internet access over a single connection.

1. **Understanding RIB Groups**:

- RIB groups allow for the import and export of routes between different routing tables.

- In this scenario, we have two RIBs: `inet.0` (the main routing table) and `VPN-A.inet.0` (the VRF-specific routing table).

2. **Statement Analysis**:

- **A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Correct. To provide Internet access to VPN-A, the default route (0.0.0.0/0) learned via BGP in the `inet.0` table must be made available in the `VPN-A.inet.0` table. This is done using the RIB group to import the default route.

- **B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Correct. Interface routes (connected routes) are typically directly added to both the global and the VRF routing tables without needing a RIB group. These routes are known to the VRF because the interfaces are part of the VRF configuration.

- **C. You do not need to use the RIB group default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Incorrect. As discussed, the default route needs to be imported into the VRF's routing table using a RIB group to enable Internet access for the VRF.

- **D. You must use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Incorrect. Interface routes are directly associated with the VRF interfaces and are automatically known to the VRF routing table. There is no need to use a RIB group for these routes.

**Conclusion**:

The correct answers are:

**A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

**B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

**Reference**:

- Juniper Networks Documentation on RIB Groups: [RIB Groups Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/rib-groups-overview.html)

- Junos OS VPNs Configuration Guide: [Junos VPNs Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vpns-overview.html)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Bobbye
12 days ago
C'mon, the default route is learned through BGP, no need to mess with that. B and D are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
18 days ago
Ah, the classic VRF internet access conundrum. I'm going with B and D, keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
Eliseo
5 days ago
User 2: Yeah, keeping it simple is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
8 days ago
User 1: I agree, B and D seem like the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
22 days ago
B and D seem to be the correct options here. We need to move the interface routes, not the default route, using the RIB group.
upvoted 0 times
Sunshine
2 days ago
Yes, that's correct. We don't need to move the default route, just the interface routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
6 days ago
I agree, we need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A. inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
22 days ago
I think option D is also correct because we need to move interface routes from inet.0 table to VPN-A.inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
27 days ago
I'm not sure about option B, do we really not need to use the RIB group for interface routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
28 days ago
I agree with Talia, option A seems like the right choice for providing VRF Internet access over a single connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
29 days ago
I think option A is correct because we need to move the default route from inet.0 table to VPN-A.inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel