BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Juniper Discussions
Exam JN0-649 Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion
Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion
Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 7
[All JN0-649 Questions]
What are two similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3? (Choose two.)
A
virtual links
B
support for multiple instances per link
C
32-bit router ID
D
protocol processing per link, not per subnet
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A, C
by
Adrianna
at
Sep 19, 2024, 02:21 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium JN0-649 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Claudio
1 months ago
C and D are the way to go, my friends. The router ID and per-link processing are the true similarities between these two networking protocols.
upvoted
0
times
...
Reiko
1 months ago
I'm going to have to say C and D as well. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 are like twins, just one's a bit more modern than the other.
upvoted
0
times
Mona
3 days ago
That's right, OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 both have 32-bit router ID and protocol processing per link.
upvoted
0
times
...
Glory
5 days ago
Yes, virtual links and support for multiple instances per link are not similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
upvoted
0
times
...
Elly
6 days ago
I agree, C and D are the correct similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Leah
1 months ago
I agree with both of you. Virtual links and 32-bit router IDs are similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
upvoted
0
times
...
Giuseppe
1 months ago
Yes, that's correct. They also both have 32-bit router IDs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Henriette
2 months ago
I think both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 support virtual links.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
Haha, virtual links? What is this, a game of DOOM? I'll go with C and D, the classic 32-bit router ID and link-based processing.
upvoted
0
times
Alease
1 months ago
Yeah, those are definitely key similarities between the two versions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Emily
1 months ago
I agree, I think the 32-bit router ID and link-based processing are the similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tandra
1 months ago
Virtual links are actually a feature in OSPF, not a game.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Hannah
2 months ago
I'm not sure about virtual links, but the multiple instances per link and the 32-bit router ID seem like good similarities between the two versions.
upvoted
0
times
Kina
20 days ago
B) support for multiple instances per link
upvoted
0
times
...
Floyd
27 days ago
A) virtual links
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Elbert
2 months ago
C and D seem like the right choices to me. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 both use 32-bit router IDs and process the protocol per link, not per subnet.
upvoted
0
times
Tesha
2 months ago
That's right, C and D are the similarities between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tesha
2 months ago
I agree, C and D are correct. Both versions use 32-bit router IDs and process the protocol per link.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Claudio
1 months agoReiko
1 months agoMona
3 days agoGlory
5 days agoElly
6 days agoLeah
1 months agoGiuseppe
1 months agoHenriette
2 months agoMitsue
2 months agoAlease
1 months agoEmily
1 months agoTandra
1 months agoHannah
2 months agoKina
20 days agoFloyd
27 days agoElbert
2 months agoTesha
2 months agoTesha
2 months ago