Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 3 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-363 Questions]

You want to share routes between two routing instances that you have configured?

What are two ways to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Zana
1 months ago
Wait, there's a 'non-forwarding instance'? Is that like a black hole for my routes or something?
upvoted 0 times
Ricarda
5 days ago
Exactly, it's all about controlling the flow of routes between different routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
17 days ago
So, it's not a black hole for your routes, it's just a way to control how routes are shared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
18 days ago
You can also configure an instance import policy to share routes between the instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
29 days ago
Yes, a non-forwarding instance is used to share routes between routing instances without actually forwarding traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 months ago
B and D, the dynamic duo of route sharing. Anything else is just routing roulette.
upvoted 0 times
Kristin
13 days ago
Definitely, those two methods provide a reliable way to share routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
14 days ago
I agree, using a non-forwarding instance and a RIB group is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
23 days ago
B and D are the way to go for sharing routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentine
2 months ago
A non-forwarding instance? Sounds like a routing dead end. I'll stick with the dynamic duo, thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Cordell
23 days ago
I agree, using a RIB group is also a good option to share routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
24 days ago
I think the best way is to configure an instance import policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arminda
3 months ago
B and D, that's the way to go. Gotta keep those routes flowing!
upvoted 0 times
Marta
2 months ago
Creating a forwarding instance is not necessary for sharing routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
2 months ago
Configuring an instance import policy can also help in sharing routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
I agree, using a non-forwarding instance and a RIB group is the way to share routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
B and D, that's the way to go. Gotta keep those routes flowing!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ludivina
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I think the answer is A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
3 months ago
I agree with Stephaine, because configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are common ways to share routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel