BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-351 Topic 6 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-351 Questions]

You are an operator for a network running 1S-IS. Two routers are failing to form an adjacency. What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Malcolm
2 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Both reasons could be causing the adjacency issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I believe another reason could be mismatched area IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
2 months ago
I agree with Matt, that could definitely be one reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
I think the reason could be mismatched router IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Both reasons could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
2 months ago
I believe another reason could be the mismatched area ID between the routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
3 months ago
Definitely C and D. Routers are like moody teenagers sometimes - they just won't communicate if the settings aren't exactly right. *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Yesenia
2 months ago
We should also check if the family iso configuration is missing from the adjacency interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
2 months ago
I think the issue is with the mismatched area ID between the L2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
3 months ago
I agree with Minna, that could definitely cause the adjacency issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
3 months ago
Hah, well if it's not one thing, it's another! I'd go with C and D as well. Can't have those routers not talking to each other, that's just bad news.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
2 months ago
Good point, that could be another reason for the adjacency not forming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
2 months ago
And the family iso configuration is missing from the adjacency interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
2 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I think the issue might be a mismatched area ID between the L2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
3 months ago
I think the reason could be mismatched router IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
3 months ago
I agree, C and D are the correct answers. Gotta love those pesky configuration issues, am I right? *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
2 months ago
C) There is a mismatched area ID between the L2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
2 months ago
A) There are mismatched router IDs on the L2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
4 months ago
C and D seem like the most likely reasons. Mismatched area ID and missing family iso configuration could definitely prevent the adjacency from forming.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
3 months ago
D) The family iso configuration is missing from the adjacency interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
3 months ago
C) There is a mismatched area ID between the L2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel