Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-351 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-351 Questions]

Which two statements about redundant trunk groups on EX Series switches are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Man
9 days ago
Whoa, this question is like a game of Tetris - gotta fit all the pieces together correctly! I'm betting on A and B, but I could be way off. Maybe I should have consulted the Magic 8-Ball before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
15 days ago
Haha, redundant trunk groups, eh? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'backup plan in case the main plan fails.' Better have a plan B, right? Anyway, I think B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
16 days ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure about C, but the other three options sound plausible. Hmm, maybe I should have studied harder for this exam.
upvoted 0 times
Patti
4 days ago
User 2: Yeah, and B makes sense too, having a backup link is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
6 days ago
User 1: I think A is correct, it helps balance the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latricia
1 months ago
I'm not sure about C and D. Can someone explain why they are not correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 months ago
I'd go with A and B. Load-balancing across the uplink interfaces and automatic failover on link failure are critical for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 months ago
I agree with Desmond. A and B make sense because they ensure traffic balance and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 months ago
B and D seem to be the correct options here. The secondary link should take over if the active link fails, and the redundant trunk group should be connected to the same aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
Magda
6 days ago
Definitely, having redundant trunk groups can help ensure network reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
11 days ago
That makes sense. It's important for redundancy and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
17 days ago
I agree, and I think D is also correct because redundant trunk groups must be connected to the same aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
18 days ago
I think B is correct because the secondary link should take over if the active link fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
2 months ago
I think the correct statements are A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel