Hmm, D looks a bit sketchy to me. Why would the switches need to be connected to the same aggregation switch? That seems like an unnecessary restriction.

upvoted 0 times

Malissa

28 days ago

C) Layer 2 control traffic is permitted on the secondary link

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

1 months ago

B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenifer

1 months ago

A) Redundant trunk groups load-balance traffic across two designated uplink interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

2 months ago

I agree with you, Alline. A and B make sense because redundant trunk groups should load-balance and provide failover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

2 months ago

Ha! Redundant trunk groups, sounds like a party I'd love to be a part of. As long as the traffic's balanced, I'm in!

upvoted 0 times

Milly

1 months ago

C) Layer 2 control traffic is permitted on the secondary link

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

1 months ago

B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

2 months ago

A) Redundant trunk groups load-balance traffic across two designated uplink interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

2 months ago

I think A and B are correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eileen

2 months ago

I agree, B and C are the right answers. Allowing control traffic on the secondary link is crucial for redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

2 months ago

B and C seem like the correct options to me. The secondary link should take over if the primary one fails, and Layer 2 control traffic should be allowed on it.

upvoted 0 times

Kenneth

2 months ago

C) Layer 2 control traffic is permitted on the secondary link

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

2 months ago

B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.

upvoted 0 times

...