Juniper Exam JN0-252 Topic 4 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-252 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 4

[All JN0-252 Questions]

What is the maximum number of nodes supported in a Mist Edge high availability cluster?

Athree nodes

Bten nodes

Cunlimited nodes

Dtwo nodes

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The maximum number of nodes supported in a Mist Edge high availability cluster is three.

This configuration ensures high availability and redundancy, providing resilience and reliability for network operations.

By having three nodes, the cluster can continue to operate effectively even if one node fails, ensuring minimal disruption.

Reference: Juniper Networks documentation on Mist Edge high availability cluster configurations.

by Bette at Nov 13, 2024, 09:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-252 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brock

2 months ago

Unlimited nodes? That's crazy talk! I'm getting flashbacks to that time my grandpa tried to build a perpetual motion machine in the basement. B or C for me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

2 months ago

Unlimited nodes? What is this, a quantum computing cluster? I'll stick with the more realistic options, B or C.

upvoted 0 times

Lindy

1 months ago

I see your point, but I think sticking with a more realistic option like B) ten nodes might be a safer bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

1 months ago

I'm leaning towards option C) unlimited nodes. It would be interesting to see how many nodes it can actually support.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

2 months ago

I agree, ten nodes is a solid option for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

2 months ago

Yeah, I agree. Option B) ten nodes seems like a more practical choice for a high availability cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

2 months ago

I think B is a good choice, ten nodes should be enough for most scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

2 months ago

I think unlimited nodes is a bit too ambitious, I would go with option B) ten nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

3 months ago

D, two nodes? This is a high availability cluster, not a basic redundancy setup. I'll have to go with A or B on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Argelia

1 months ago

Having more nodes definitely increases the reliability of the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

2 months ago

Yeah, I would go with B) ten nodes for a more robust setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

2 months ago

I agree, having more nodes would provide better redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

2 months ago

I think A) three nodes makes more sense for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

3 months ago

Unlimited nodes? Nah, that can't be right. There's gotta be some kind of limit, even if it's a high one. I'm gonna go with C.

upvoted 0 times

Malcom

2 months ago

User 3: I'm not sure, but I'll go with C) unlimited nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

2 months ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. I'm going with B) ten nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

2 months ago

User 1: I think there has to be a limit, even if it's high.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's D) two nodes because high availability clusters typically have a primary and a secondary node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

3 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is B. Ten nodes seems like a reasonable limit for a high availability cluster.

upvoted 0 times

Garry

2 months ago

I believe it's B) ten nodes as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberlie

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's either A) three nodes or B) ten nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edwin

3 months ago

I agree, ten nodes sounds like a reasonable limit for a high availability cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Omega

3 months ago

I think the answer is B) ten nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilburn

3 months ago

I believe it's B) ten nodes because more nodes would provide better redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

3 months ago

I think it's A) three nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...