Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-231 Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-231 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-231 Questions]

An application firewall processes the first packet in a session for which the application has not yet been identified.

In this scenario, which action does the application firewall take on the packet?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This is necessary to ensure that the application firewall can properly identify the application and the correct security policies can be applied before allowing any traffic to pass through.

If the first packet was allowed to pass without first being identified, then the application firewall would not know which security policies to apply - and this could potentially lead to security vulnerabilities or breaches. So it's important that the first packet is held until the application is identified.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cyndy
2 months ago
I don't know, man. If I was the firewall, I'd probably just throw a dart at the options and choose whatever it lands on. Who needs strategy when you've got pure luck on your side?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
2 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If I was an application firewall, I'd definitely want to hold that first packet until I could figure out what's going on. Gotta keep the network safe, you know? D is the winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Rusty
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't risk allowing unknown packets to pass through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, holding the first packet until the application is identified is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better for the firewall to hold the first packet until the application is identified to avoid blocking legitimate traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
2 months ago
I agree with Diego, denying the first packet makes sense to prevent potential security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers who wrote this question were just sitting around trying to come up with the most convoluted firewall scenario possible. But hey, A sounds good to me - let's just let that first packet in and see what happens!
upvoted 0 times
Vincent
1 months ago
C) It denies the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
B) It denies the first packet and sends an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 months ago
A) It allows the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audrie
2 months ago
I'm thinking B is the way to go here. Deny that first packet and let the user know they messed up. Gotta keep those firewalls on lockdown, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Flo
1 months ago
D) It holds the first packet until the application is identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
2 months ago
C) It denies the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
2 months ago
B) It denies the first packet and sends an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
2 months ago
A) It allows the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diego
3 months ago
I think the application firewall would deny the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. You gotta hold that first packet until you figure out what app it's coming from, right? Don't want any sneaky stuff getting through.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
2 months ago
Definitely, can't be too careful with security measures like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
2 months ago
Yeah, holding the first packet until you know the application sounds like the best move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
2 months ago
I think you're right, D does make sense. Better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel