Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
ISTQB Exam ISTQB-CTFL Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion
Topic #: 5
Which or the following would be a key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool?
The key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool lies in their approaches and scope. A peer review is a manual inspection of the code by peers or colleagues, focusing not only on the technical aspects of the code but also on other elements such as design, compliance with standards, and maintainability. Peer reviews can identify defects, suggest improvements, and ensure that the code adheres to best practices and team standards.
On the other hand, static analysis is an automated process performed by tools designed to analyze the code without executing it. These tools can detect potential issues such as syntax errors, vulnerabilities, and code smells based on predefined rules and patterns. While static analysis is technically focused, it lacks the broader perspective that human reviewers can provide, such as evaluating the code's maintainability or adherence to project-specific standards. Therefore, static analysis targets the code technically, whereas peer review encompasses a wider range of aspects, making option B the correct answer.
Cecily
4 months agoKaty
4 months agoFrancisca
3 months agoBenedict
3 months agoCyndy
4 months agoLuther
4 months agoDottie
3 months agoLyda
3 months agoGregoria
3 months agoTy
4 months agoMadonna
4 months agoThaddeus
4 months agoMargurite
5 months agoErin
4 months agoFrankie
4 months agoMagnolia
4 months agoGail
4 months agoEzekiel
4 months agoTonja
4 months agoRhea
4 months agoJamal
5 months ago