Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
ISTQB-CTFL Exam - Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion
Topic #: 5
Which or the following would be a key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool?
The key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool lies in their approaches and scope. A peer review is a manual inspection of the code by peers or colleagues, focusing not only on the technical aspects of the code but also on other elements such as design, compliance with standards, and maintainability. Peer reviews can identify defects, suggest improvements, and ensure that the code adheres to best practices and team standards.
On the other hand, static analysis is an automated process performed by tools designed to analyze the code without executing it. These tools can detect potential issues such as syntax errors, vulnerabilities, and code smells based on predefined rules and patterns. While static analysis is technically focused, it lacks the broader perspective that human reviewers can provide, such as evaluating the code's maintainability or adherence to project-specific standards. Therefore, static analysis targets the code technically, whereas peer review encompasses a wider range of aspects, making option B the correct answer.
Carisa
10 months agoShaquana
10 months agoMoon
10 months agoAshley
10 months agoKimbery
11 months agoCathrine
11 months agoJeanice
11 months agoBette
11 months agoRuthann
11 months agoSalome
11 months agoAlaine
11 months agoGilberto
11 months agoNathan
11 months agoMarquetta
11 months agoJuliann
12 months agoJohnna
12 months agoAja
12 months agoCecily
2 years agoKaty
2 years agoFrancisca
2 years agoBenedict
2 years agoCyndy
2 years agoLuther
2 years agoDottie
2 years agoLyda
2 years agoGregoria
2 years agoTy
2 years agoMadonna
2 years agoThaddeus
2 years agoMargurite
2 years agoErin
2 years agoFrankie
2 years agoMagnolia
2 years agoGail
2 years agoEzekiel
2 years agoTonja
2 years agoRhea
2 years agoJamal
2 years ago